Commercial real estate credit investments are typically considered lower risk than equity. They are seen to offer predictable returns, priority in the capital stack and strong downside protection – and this is a well-founded view, when LVRs are conservative. But as LVRs rise, the safety net erodes. At some point, credit risk begins to look a lot like equity risk, without the upside potential.
Credit risk in commercial real estate is often viewed as insulated from the ups and downs that equity investors face. Investors enjoy predictable returns, priority in the capital stack in many cases, and, under the right structuring, a generous equity buffer beneath them. But that sense of safety is not absolute. It hinges on one critical variable: the loan‑to‑value ratio (LVR).
At conservative LVRs, typically in the 50% to 65% range, the equity cushion is substantial. Borrowers have enough capital at risk that even a meaningful market correction leaves lenders well protected. A 20% fall in property value may hurt the equity investor, but the lender still sits above water. In this zone, credit behaves like credit: low loss severity, strong recoveries and stable outcomes.
But as leverage increases, the character of the risk begins to change. At LVRs of 75% to 85%, the equity buffer thins to the point where lenders are pulled closer to the economic swings that traditionally belong to equity holders. A moderate market decline can wipe out the borrower’s capital entirely, exposing the lender to losses far earlier in the cycle. The risk profile of the loan becomes intimately tied to market value volatility, not just the borrower’s ability to service the debt.
This is the tipping point where credit risk begins to behave more like equity risk. As LVR rises into the 75% to 85% range, relatively modest declines in asset values can rapidly erode the lender’s protection. Investment risk becomes highly sensitive to small movements in value and disproportionately concentrated in the downside. Of course, once asset devaluation brings the effective LVR to 100%, the loss-profile is essentially equity-like.
Unlike equity investors, however, credit investor returns are limited to yield. Poor risk management compounded by unfavourable market conditions can expose credit investors to potential capital downside, despite never having exposure to capital upside. They absorb an increasing share of downside risk without the offset of potential gains.
This creates a fundamental imbalance in the risk-return equation. Consider the contrast: an equity position at 50% leverage can see returns swing dramatically from negative to double-digit positive depending on how the market moves. That variability is the essence of equity investing. But a high LVR credit position does not share in this optionality. At 85% LVR, the risk begins to mirror equity exposure, yet the return remains constrained to the income generated from the loan (which may itself cease or reduce given such a high LVR).
The trade-off becomes increasingly unattractive: equity-like risk without equity-like reward.
For investors, the practical message is more nuanced. Higher LVR credit is not inherently inappropriate, and there are sound reasons why some investors would allocate capital to higher risk, higher return segments of the credit market.
Mezzanine and high-leverage strategies can deliver materially higher yields, often in the mid-teens, and may play a deliberate role within a diversified portfolio. However, the key distinction is that returns tend to increase in a linear fashion, while loss severity increases non-linearly as the equity buffer thins. As LVR rises, outcomes become increasingly sensitive to relatively small movements in asset values.
As such, positioning within the capital stack, and the degree of protection offered by underlying equity, is often a more important determinant of risk than the quoted coupon itself.
High-LVR credit may offer attractive yield, but it can also expose investors to equity-like downside dynamics that are not immediately apparent.
Ultimately, commercial real estate credit investments are typically considered lower risk than equity. They are seen to offer predictable returns, priority in the capital stack and strong downside protection – and this is a well-founded view, when LVRs are conservative. But as LVRs rise, the safety net erodes. At some point, credit risk begins to look a lot like equity risk, without the upside potential.
In the end, investors must decide the types of risk they’re comfortable with, and allocate accordingly. Investors who are uncomfortable with equity-like risk, should ensure that any credit-style investments they make, are appropriately risk managed, rather than inadvertently exposing themselves to the very risk they’re seeking to avoid. Investors who are comfortable with equity risk should seek exposure to equity products, which compensate the risk by providing exposure to the potential upside associated with equity returns.
How Trilogy Funds structures investments to avoid credit risk resembling equity risk
The Trilogy Monthly Income Trust (the Trust) is designed for investors seeking regular, reliable income through exposure to a diversified portfolio of property-backed loans that vary in length to a maximum loan term of 30 months.
Central to the Trust’s investment philosophy is the disciplined management of risk. Specifically, maintaining conservative LVRs that preserve a meaningful equity buffer beneath each loan. By lending predominately at LVRs comfortably below levels where credit risk begins to resemble equity risk, the Trust aims to protect investor capital from the kinds of value-driven volatility outlined in this article.
This emphasis on structural protection is fundamental. As the analysis shows, credit behaves like credit only when the equity cushion is sufficient to absorb market swings. Once leverage pushed towards 75% to 85% LVR, lenders are drawn into equity-like downside without the benefit of equity-like upside, a risk imbalance the Trust deliberately avoids. Instead, the Trust focuses on first-mortgage security over real property and robust borrower assessments help insulate investors from market-driven loss severity.
Through selective lending, active portfolio management and a commitment to conservative credit principles, the Trust seeks to generate competitive, risk-adjusted monthly income while maintaining a clear focus on capital preservation. For investors, this approach offers access to the income potential of commercial real estate credit, without venturing into the high-LVR territory where the risk profile begins to shift unfavourably toward equity-like exposure.
Learn more about the Trust at https://trilogyfunds.com.au/trilogy-monthly-income-trust/.
This article is issued by Trilogy Funds Management Limited ABN 59 080 383 679 AFSL 261425 (Trilogy Funds) as responsible entity for the Trilogy Monthly Income Trust ARSN 121 846 722. Application for investment can only be made on the application form accompanying the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) dated 3 May 2024. The PDS and Target Market Determination (TMD) dated 3 May 2024 for the Trilogy Monthly Income Trust ARSN 121 846 722 are available at www.trilogyfunds.com.au. The PDS contains full details of the terms and conditions of investment and should be read in full, particularly the risk section, prior to lodging any application or making a further investment. All investments, including those with Trilogy Funds, involve risk which can lead to no or lower than expected returns, or a loss of part or all of your capital. Trilogy Funds is licensed to provide only general financial product advice about its products and therefore recommends you seek personal advice on the suitability of this investment to your objectives, financial situation and needs from a licensed financial adviser. Investments with Trilogy Funds are not bank deposits and are not government guaranteed. Past performance is no indicator of future performance.
